<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1014887" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1014887</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/topography-discussion-condensed-technical-fonts#comment-1086560</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I agree that the fonts look nice and everything, but that still doesn&#039;t change the fact that 90% of the buying power in America are people between the ages 40-50...  And then if you figure a good percentage of the people in those age brackets need glasses to read, why would you want to make it more difficult for them?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just my opinion..&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2001 00:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Shotaker</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1086560 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/topography-discussion-condensed-technical-fonts#comment-1086508</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I like them if they are used tastefully. I think they have sort of a &#039;millenium&#039; look about them. Remember the space movies years ago about life in the year 2020 (which isn&#039;t that far away now) and fonts similar to these were used? I think that maybe people use them because they are sometimes associated with computers and cyber things.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here is a site with a few small fonts. They have a nice collection of everything else too. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fontsnthings.com/themes/hardlines.html&quot; class=&quot;bb-url&quot;&gt;http://www.fontsnthings.com/themes/hardlines.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I usually get my fonts at &lt;a href=&quot;http://abstractfonts.com/setup.html&quot; class=&quot;bb-url&quot;&gt;http://abstractfonts.com/setup.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
They have a good choice of fonts in general there. I like how they have a customize preview. You can see what the font will look like before you D/L it. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;disastermaster&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2001 09:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>disaster-master</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1086508 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/topography-discussion-condensed-technical-fonts#comment-1086507</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I too think that they are easy to read, but can&#039;t imagine trying to read them on a higher screen resolution than 1024x768 which is what I use.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think that the type of people that would like them would be more technically inclined type, whereas normal john does that are not request internet (or computer) users probably wouldn&#039;t because the wouldn&#039;t be used to seeing that kind of font in magazines and whatnot.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2001 08:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>KeithMcL</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1086507 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/topography-discussion-condensed-technical-fonts#comment-1086504</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;That raises an interesting point, Shotaker. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Most of us said that the fonts were &quot;easy&quot; to read, and you said they were hard to read. I would like to know if there are any studies out there that show what sizes are too small for people in general. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a difference between a font that is &quot;not as easy to read&quot; and one that is impossible to read, in terms of how we use them in design. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For instance, I think it is acceptable to use a tiny font for links to functions that are rarely used, copyright info, and other non-critical purposes. Yet you wouldn&#039;t use that same tiny font for things that the eye spends lots of time on (news stories, main content), or important links (eg, main sections of a website). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What do you think?&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2001 07:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sersun</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1086504 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/topography-discussion-condensed-technical-fonts#comment-1086414</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I think the fonts are too hard to read.  What&#039;s the point of making a website with tiny fonts that look cool, but no one normal can read?&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2001 09:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Shotaker</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1086414 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/topography-discussion-condensed-technical-fonts#comment-1086389</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I really like them. I agree that because they are so readable and take up so few bites on a gif they won&#039;t pass as just another fad. They probably will lose popularity, and their uses will be for more specific purposes after they&#039;ve been around for a little while but still will be there.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are definately some hideous ones but many of them look even almost elegant.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2001 00:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Fringey</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1086389 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/topography-discussion-condensed-technical-fonts#comment-1086336</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;From a technical standpoint, I like them because they are amazingly easy to read even at such small sizes. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For that reason I don&#039;t think they will pass as a trend (at least until we commonly have 300 dpi monitors).  And, as Suzanne&#039;s link shows, there are various styles of pixel fonts. Hopefully that will keep them from looking cliche.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Steven&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2001 05:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sersun</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1086336 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>I&#039;m amused</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/topography-discussion-condensed-technical-fonts#comment-1085893</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;The 5-7-8-9 px aliased font has been around for a couple of years now, and used in print.  Once it gets to print, you&#039;re pretty well assured it&#039;s run its course of being a fad on the web.  They are used well in some places, not so well in others.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A comprehensive look: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wpdfd.com/pixelfonts.htm&quot; class=&quot;bb-url&quot;&gt;http://www.wpdfd.com/pixelfonts.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/smile.png&quot; title=&quot;Smiling&quot; alt=&quot;Smiling&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt; Suzanne&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2001 21:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Suzanne</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1085893 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/web-design-and-graphics/topography-discussion-condensed-technical-fonts#comment-1085868</link>
    <description> &lt;blockquote class=&quot;bb-quote-body&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Quote: Personally I like them. However I think they are starting to be over used. I can also see how some people could find them incredibly ugly.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i really like them, but after viewing all the sites you posted, i&#039;m having enough of them for today.&lt;br /&gt;
it&#039;s the same with every kind of trend: it starts slowly, then comes the hype and after only the hardcore-fans still use it...&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2001 09:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>merlin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1085868 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
