Jiffy — Mon, 02 Jul 2001 19:11:05 +0000

Hey, that was quick! It looks quite promising.

There is quite a lot of typo's and spelling mistakes that are quite distracting. Try running it through a spell checker. Having said that, I'm sure your English is far better than my Belgian!

Nice work with the forum! You look a bit lonely in it though!

Basically, you need loads and loads of content and then start drumming up visitors to the site and hopefully it'll take off.

Jiffy — Mon, 02 Jul 2001 19:03:33 +0000

Working now, well one page is.

I like the colours a lot. It's nice clean and fresh looking. The next step is to develop some content for it. At the moment, it's really a page review. Hopefully next you'll be here for a website review!

Gyrbo — Mon, 02 Jul 2001 19:01:50 +0000

Maybe my host was down, the site is finished: site-32.com

Jiffy — Mon, 02 Jul 2001 18:28:41 +0000

Hmm, I got nothing, nadda, zilch. I tried deleting the "new" bit at the end of the url to no avail.
I'll try later.

The Webmistress — Sat, 30 Jun 2001 10:10:10 +0000

Gyrbo, please don't get the hump with any comments made here. You asked what people thought of the design and that is what they are doing.

It is a lot better & fresher looking but I do agree with citron about being a general resource that "webmasters/mistresses" would find useful unless it offered something completely different and original.

Gyrbo — Sat, 30 Jun 2001 08:01:11 +0000

Gee please, don't look at the ball logo. It's just a sample banner I placed there. Otherwise it would look too empty.
Thanks, I won't bother you with my website anymore. However, I will come back regualery to check for new posts.

citron — Sat, 30 Jun 2001 06:58:31 +0000

Gyrbo,

I like the new logo at the top left - I don't like the old ball logo in the centre.

I suggest more space - for example around the navigation entries and at the end of the text.

You ask if the design is good. Well, it's OK if it's there as a resource for yourself and your existing customers, and it could also be fine if your scripts are sufficiently original and useful in themselves for you to get listed at other script portal sites. However I don't see it attracting any new business for website design.

Stephen

Getting there

KarenArt — Fri, 29 Jun 2001 22:16:38 +0000

I like your redesign better!

I do think you only need one logo at the top [Site 32] or the ball logo, but not both.

Do realize that spelling and basic grammer IS a part of good website (yeah, I spell it that way) design!

If you are sloppy about that, then no one will notice all your other brilliant work.

You actually don't have that many words on your page, so it would only take a few seconds to run your text through a spell checker.

I'm terrible at spelling so I have three different people I always ask to check my pages, and I still have visitors who will point out errors that we haven't seen.

I think you're on the right track though. I'll be interested to see what you do with it.

Gyrbo — Fri, 29 Jun 2001 21:09:53 +0000

Well hey, I just typed that text in 1 minute. It's basically just there to show how it looks like with some content. Just say what you think of the design?

might as well tackle THIS hurdle now...

taff — Fri, 29 Jun 2001 19:47:16 +0000

many typos/spelling/grammatical errors in such a small block of text:

verry = very
writen = written
improve = improving
seconde = second
some thing = something
cause = because

and in my opinion:

website = web site (this one could be nitpicky and open to debate)