<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1013003" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1013003</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/looking-some-feeback#comment-1075529</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Looks really nice!  Now, I&#039;m having some problems using the site but it could be just me (for some reason my computer does weird things sometimes - I&#039;m using IE 5.0 BTW).  Like the pages don&#039;t scroll at all and some of the content is getting cut off at the bottom of the screen.  When I try it in netscape, the bottom frame doesn&#039;t show up at all!!  Weird..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I like the menu, but I wish it didn&#039;t have to cover up your nice logo.  Could it go down the side maybe?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall I think the design is very nice, but the graphics inside each of the pages don&#039;t seem to coordinate well with the rest of the design.  The main design has a brown/orange colour scheme, but a the graphics on individual graphics start introducing cool colours.  It just looks cluttered sometimes.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Honestly, what I would do is get rid of a lot of those graphics in there and go with plain text.  I&#039;m feeling rather confused in here.  If the design was more streamlined, I think it might be easier for people to use the site.  The &quot;Fun with Photos&quot; section is particularly confusing.  I think that there should be more explanation of what &quot;Fun with Photos&quot; means, what you can do on the site and how to do it.  I was kind of surprised when I clicked on a link and all of a sudden got an order form. (it explains it, but on the right side where people aren&#039;t as likely to look).  In general, I don&#039;t think that the design is as straightforward as it could be from a usability perspective.  You&#039;re trying a lot of neat effects, which is good, but I think that if it&#039;s necessary to explain something to your visitors, there&#039;s probably something wrong with the design.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You&#039;ve got a heck of a lot of imgaes on here - the site seems to be loading quite quickly for me (I&#039;m on a T1 line here) but you should definitely make sure that it doesn&#039;t take too long on a dial-up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whoah!  The &quot;Camera&quot; page is doing really wacky things on here!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It seems like you&#039;re trying to cram a lot of info onto one page.  Like on the contact page, the contact form is butting right up against the photograph there - there should be some white space in there somewhere.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Enough?  I really like the overall design, as I said.  It makes me feel like I&#039;m in an actual camera shop.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2000 19:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1075529 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/looking-some-feeback#comment-1075467</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Hello.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What a nice and creative site.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To make it look better, use the background in the top frame in the bottom frame too.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;the blue text on the menu doesnt look good, the blue, doesnt have anything else to compliment, so I think you should change the blue text to white.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You did the navigiation part good though, it works fine in IE5.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nice job.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2000 19:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Grandmaster</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1075467 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
