<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1012043" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1012043</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title>graphics</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/atomicpixelscom-review-plz#comment-1069478</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Thanks for the feedback.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I run the site and write scripts, and my bro makes graphics in a sub site (The Pushpin).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &#039;logo&#039; text was suppose to be a temporary thing, but I&#039;ve had it there for about a month (I forgot about it).  I&#039;ll get my bro (photoshop phreak) on that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Did you find it easy to navigate?&lt;br /&gt;
What would you say I do with the blue borders?&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2000 22:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mark Hensler</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1069478 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/atomicpixelscom-review-plz#comment-1069454</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Hmm, yeah, I agree with Megan. You have an &#039;artwork&#039; type site that doesn&#039;t have a graphical interface. That&#039;s a little weird. There are a lot of problems with the site design and graphic wise (the problem is there aren&#039;t any graphics!) so I&#039;m just going to say scrap this design and go all out. Even if that means taking six months to come up with a killer design...&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2000 16:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Justin S</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1069454 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/atomicpixelscom-review-plz#comment-1069443</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I&#039;m sure your programming is well done, but your visual design needs some work.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Take the logo banner for instance.  The font is plain and boring (just HTML text!), there is no eye catching graphic or anything like that.  It looks so boring.  It&#039;s usually important to have a good, eye-catching logo.  Try playing around with photoshop/psp effects and filters to fancy up your logo.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall it just doesn&#039;t look like you&#039;ve put as much thought into the visual design as you have with the backend.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2000 13:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1069443 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/atomicpixelscom-review-plz#comment-1069440</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t like the blue borders. Your logo needs some work. The whole patch of blue on top doesn&#039;t serve much purpose.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2000 11:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jackchen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1069440 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
