<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1011802" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1011802</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/design-vs-design#comment-1067743</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Yes, definetly #2.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, on number one:  The Flash Intro is really stupid, I&#039;d just scrap it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Onto Number Two.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I agree with everything that Justin said, so this&#039;ll be rather short, since I won&#039;t repost all of his comments [if it ain&#039;t broke...]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1).  The site seems to static, add some Mouseovers to that top bar.  It&#039;d look great.&lt;br /&gt;
2).  I don&#039;t like all of the little arrows, perhaps instead of having a big line of them on the center of the page where the account features are listed, you could make separate categories [Supported Scripting Languages, Line Speed, etc.]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Other than that, looks alright.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2000 18:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>TheGraphicsExperience</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1067743 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/design-vs-design#comment-1067739</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Definitely #2! So I&#039;m just going to review that one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) You overuse the drop-shadows. I think for the price part it looks good (you need to fix it though, &#039;cause the shadow is cut off), but the one you use up next to the logo looks down right horrible. It would look much better as just plain text.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) The corners of the site are jagged. At least the top two are. Looks like the bottom two are fine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3) I don&#039;t like the big white bar that seperates &#039;Account Features&#039; from &#039;Hostrocket News.&#039; It really stick out like a sore thumb in my opinion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4) For some reason the four &#039;S&#039; thing at the bottom of the main page looks really cheesy to me. I can&#039;t figure out why though. Funny....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Overall I think it&#039;s a big improvement over the last design...&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2000 16:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Justin S</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1067739 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>to design #2</title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/design-vs-design#comment-1067733</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;The first design seems to over-use the bold, fairly large text and it really clutters the design more than anything.  In addition, the drop-shadows in the first design also bug me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, the second design was much better in my opinion.  It really seems to fit the idea of a futuristic hosting company with ROCKET in its name &lt;img src=&quot;https://www.webmaster-forums.net/misc/smileys/smile.png&quot; title=&quot;Smiling&quot; alt=&quot;Smiling&quot; class=&quot;smiley-content&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I like how it all fits together except for the unusually large text in the bottom right hand corner with the pro&#039;s of signing up with Host Rocket.  Oh yeah -- I like the use of the drop-shadows in the second design as opposed to the first design.  Good job.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2000 15:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>xrs</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1067733 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/design-vs-design#comment-1067721</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t think you need the flash intro&#039;s.  I didn&#039;t watch all of both of them, but they seem rather simplistic and beginner-ish to me. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the first one:  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first thing that stands out to me on here is the drop shadows on the numbers - those are way too big!!! IMHO big drop shadows almost always look cheesy.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The logo looks good on here - I think that it should be featured more prominently in the design.  The black that dominates the rest of the design kind of overpowers it I think.  That logo would look good with a more minimalist design - mostly white with red and a little black.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You&#039;ve also got too many font sizes and styles on the right side &quot;account features&quot; section.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second one is much better.  I&#039;m not sure about the fluorescent yellow - I would have gone with something a little less greenish, but this colour sure does stand out!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Again, shrink down your drop shadows.  The $19.95 and $29.95 ones are cut off too.  The four s&#039;s on the right side need to be spaced out a little bit I think.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ON the FAQ page you&#039;ve got bright blue links on a lighter blue background - not good.  Eew!  And bright green vlinks - something needs to be done about that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On some of the pages there is a white line underneath the navbar but on some of them there isn&#039;t.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t know about you but I tend to find &quot;Click here&quot; to be really annoying (TEch Support page) - why don&#039;t you just link the header text?&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2000 14:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1067721 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/design-vs-design#comment-1067717</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;This post will be moved to the Web Site REview forum...&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2000 14:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matt Kaufman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1067717 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
