Matt Kaufman — Mon, 27 Mar 2000 23:47:00 +0000

Cool! Good choice.

------------------
Webmaster's Network
WebmasterDir.com
WNDesigners.com

Parker — Mon, 27 Mar 2000 21:27:00 +0000

Very good! Thanks JP

------------------
~Parker Trasborg~
Formerly- ParkerT and sixflags111

fairhousing — Mon, 27 Mar 2000 19:29:00 +0000

sounds good

------------------
CLICK 4 some tested resources for making money $, hosting, and web promotions.

JP Stones — Mon, 27 Mar 2000 14:54:00 +0000

OK 60 secs it is.
However I will have to set it to a higher number again if some spammers abuse it...
JP

------------------
What Next?
"Easing you onto the Internet"
http://www.what-next.com

fairhousing — Sun, 26 Mar 2000 21:07:00 +0000

i think a minute would be nice. met us in the middle plz.

also i wouldn't list the time one has to wait inbetween post if detering spammers is the objective. most are kids and when they get the first message they just think they got busted some how and stop.

------------------
CLICK 4 some tested resources for making money $, hosting, and web promotions.

Sun, 26 Mar 2000 19:25:00 +0000

Shows how much I know about UBB

I have never ran into the problem, but I can see the argument... Doesn't really matter to me. I will leave it up to Patrick.

------------------
TWF Administrator

Looking for Web Hosting Services?
Dynamic Internet Solutions : http://www.dids.com
Windows NT and UNIX Hosting ($9.95 - $399.95), Dedicated Servers, and Co-Location Programs

Rob Pengelly — Sun, 26 Mar 2000 15:09:00 +0000

Chad,
With the curren't settings members have to wait 120 seconds after 1 post, before they can post another.

------------------
The most used and accepted excuse for missing classes in University is "My Grandmother Died".
http://www.wiredstart.com : The Technology Start Page

Sun, 26 Mar 2000 14:36:00 +0000

What in the world are you talking about Matt!?!?!

------------------
TWF Administrator

Looking for Web Hosting Services?
Dynamic Internet Solutions : http://www.dids.com
Windows NT and UNIX Hosting ($9.95 - $399.95), Dedicated Servers, and Co-Location Programs

Matt Kaufman — Sun, 26 Mar 2000 13:58:00 +0000

I think 120 seconds is a little to much! It is so annoying to have to wait at my computer that long. I would recommend taking it down lower, maybe 15-30 seconds?

------------------
Webmaster's Network
WebmasterDir.com
WNDesigners.com

Maverick — Sun, 26 Mar 2000 05:47:00 +0000

quote:I think 2 minutes is a reasonable time to think and post, or not?

Since when did thinking become a prerequisite of posting? That changes my entire outlook.

I agree that 120 seconds is a little too long. It doesn't happen often, but every now and then I run into that limit and it's a little annoying. How about dropping it to 60-90 seconds. It's unlikely for a person to be able to post more than once in that time period, but it's probably long enough to stop the spammers/flooders.