<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1004959" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1004959</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/yet-another-site-look#comment-1024447</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;I sympathize Malte.  As you say, if your customer is happy and pays, why worry about their customers  &lt;img src=&quot;http://www.webmaster-forums.com/ubb/smile.gif&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;bb-image&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2000 23:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>AndyB</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1024447 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/yet-another-site-look#comment-1024446</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Well, cant do nothing about the red: Corporate Identity. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I know its ugly, I never said anything else.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Their new policy is that they want all images at 156 color gif and JPeg quality 10, everything done over again. So we&#039;ll just do it the way: Main thing is the customer is happy, who cares about their customers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Malte&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2000 13:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Malte</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1024446 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/yet-another-site-look#comment-1024445</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;The main image that comes up first that says:&lt;br /&gt;
Ecklebe Wohnwelt is blurry.&lt;br /&gt;
On some of the secondary pages their are horizontal scroll bars (800x600)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;------------------&lt;br /&gt;
Travis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eboarding.net&quot; class=&quot;bb-url&quot;&gt;Eboarding.net&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2000 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1024445 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/yet-another-site-look#comment-1024444</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;This is without a doubt the ugliest example of your work you have ever posted.  If you hadn&#039;t posted it as yours, I hate to think what might have been said.  Everyone here knows you do far, far, better stuff than this .. but I guess if that&#039;s what your customer insists on, what else can you do??&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Image quality is far worse than your normal standards and some of the images desperately need compression - the 100+kb image of the lady on the DM998 couch, for example.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2000 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>AndyB</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1024444 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/yet-another-site-look#comment-1024443</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Hmmm... I remember the old design, a little... I think...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) I think the blue image flips look good, and have good image quality. The red version, though, needs some work in the image quality department. I also think you can get away with the bevel effect, but I would s**** the drop shadow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2) Why is there nothing in the frames above and below the content/menu area? I would put a logo up in the top part, and then just extend the content/menu part down to the bottom of the screen. I agree that there should be a logo on every page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3) You need to improve the resolution on almost all the graphics. The only ones that have a good quality are the blue version of the navigation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;------------------&lt;br /&gt;
Is this signiture short enough?&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2000 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Justin S</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1024443 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/website-critique-area/yet-another-site-look#comment-1024442</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;THis, for some reason, is looking just a little bit blurry to me.  That photo isn&#039;t working - it&#039;s too small to really get a good idea of what it is at first glance.  Try to find something simpler.  The circle on there doesn&#039;t look so good either - a little bit jagged.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The headers on the links page are poorly optimised as well. Speaking of the links page, I think that this would be a lot better with plain text instead of all those little logos.  The page wouldn&#039;t scroll nearly as much.  Either that or put the logos side by side instead of on their own lines.  A lot of those logos are too small to really read, so I hope they&#039;ll be readily identified by your audience.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s an image missing on the online-einkauf page. Oh, and the site title should appear on every page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think that this design is alright, but a lot could be improved.  Lose the frames.  The nav buttons look rather cheesy with that 3D bevel effect and drop shadows.  Most of the graphics look poorly omptimized.  There are a lot of graphics on here again - but I guess your company doesn&#039;t worry about download speeds (at least put in the alt tags though).  There is too much red as well IMO, and the pale blue clashes with it.  A lot of the content is taking up more vertical space than it needs to, causing an unnecessarily large amount of scrolling (particularly the stellenmarkt pages).&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2000 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1024442 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
