dyc — Tue, 31 Aug 1999 22:48:00 +0000

Get rid of the animations on the entry page. It took AGES for the whole page to eventually animate into place - I read the text, decided I wanted to low-graphics version, and then had to wait about 20 seconds while the graphics spiralled around.

BCwebdesign — Tue, 31 Aug 1999 22:38:00 +0000

mmmmmm... dats funny....

.... coz its been tried in alot of diff speeds..never had that problem.....

BUT.... is gone anyways it was beginning to irritate me.

check now... reload obviously

----------
Bandit Creations Web design
bandit.nasha.com

Tue, 31 Aug 1999 22:14:00 +0000

He's not overestimating it. I counted and it took 35 seconds for the graphics to spiral into place. It got me really anoyed too. The page only takes a few sec. to load, but everything spiraling into place takes way too long.

----------
FireBurn Web Publishing - fireburn.com
[red]Low cost web design, graphic design, and more![/red]

BCwebdesign — Tue, 31 Aug 1999 21:52:00 +0000

I think ur over exaggerating a bit DYC...

maybe it was due to the server or something...but this page never takes longer than 10-15 seconds to COMPLETELY load.

and i don't understand how you could have clicked anything to go to the page if the graphics were still spiralling..... ?

but anyway... try it again...i'm POSITIVE that it'll load correctly.

later

----------
Bandit Creations Web design
bandit.nasha.com

BCwebdesign — Mon, 30 Aug 1999 19:54:00 +0000

er...I really dunno wot your grevience is KiD....
ummm... the graphics just have a "dust" around the edges...
personally i don't see anything wrong with it...in both resolutions.

the high-low crap... have you timed the two?
the low IS low...it basically has only two main graphics for the whole site!
the whole idea is to have a serious, plain down business site for one...
the other one is more of a show-off type of affair...with mouseover's and frames.... i could get more show-offy, but that'll just make me go too far....
I'm constructing a portfolio of demo sites, and i'll show you just how much i can show off..

but for now... the main aim was just business.. and its been working!!!!

the gap got me stumped... i'll THINK about the bgcolor change LOL*

----------
Bandit Creations Web design
bandit.nasha.com

Mon, 30 Aug 1999 19:06:00 +0000

I like it with the black side things. But you gotta fix the gap and make the background white!

1) I would keep it to one design, no high-low crap. besides, the low version should include NO graphics. so they are almost the same, with different graphics.

2) I like the buttons on the top frame, but the main graphics for the high version are weird looking.

----------
FireBurn Web Publishing - fireburn.com
[red]Low cost web design, graphic design, and more![/red]

BCwebdesign — Mon, 30 Aug 1999 02:07:00 +0000

You'll be surprised what you'll find if you click my link now...

about the gap... i'm totally stumped, I could put the top graphic into the table, but then i'll be messing up the table background, and if i want to make it go with either the contant or the graphic, somewhere its gonna look bad... i'll see what i can do though...

later

----------
Bandit Creations Web design
bandit.nasha.com

JP Stones — Sun, 29 Aug 1999 21:45:00 +0000

OK, that is the idea
However in IE5 there is a gap between the top graphic and the main table.
JP

----------
The Webmaster Forums are part of the Web Currents Network.
The Next Step in Website Development - http://www.what-next.com

BCwebdesign — Sun, 29 Aug 1999 21:35:00 +0000

Done!!! JP, check it out.

----------
Bandit Creations Web design
bandit.nasha.com

Sun, 29 Aug 1999 18:17:00 +0000

Of course thats what I meant

----------
FireBurn Web Publishing - fireburn.com
[red]Low cost web design, graphic design, and more![/red]