b00ty — Sun, 04 Jun 2000 02:14:00 +0000

Hehe, I just realized that'd probably be like that a few minutes ago.

I wasn't getting much response from the places I posted at, so I decided to just use a few CGI templates (using the old design code, but less JS) to speed things up.

Unfortunately, I've got a CGI poll running as well, and I didn't know how to call the CGI poll from inside another CGI script.. anyway, it got messy and I never changed the code back.

I'll fix the poll code, and that should let you view the page normally..

[Reason for edit: POLL CODE IS NOW FIXED]

-b00ty

[This message has been edited by b00ty (edited 03 June 2000).]

cds — Sun, 04 Jun 2000 02:06:00 +0000

right now, it is really good cross-browser compatible. I get a blank screen in both NS 4.7 and IE5

b00ty — Sat, 03 Jun 2000 14:42:00 +0000

That's what I was afraid of...

Supposedly, I'm supposed to be able to use the DIV tag in both Netscape and IE, but I never found out how to get it working correctly in NS, is there a way to do that?

Also, is it possible to have a single StyleSheet for different resolutions in IE? Right now my script detects the screen resolution, and directs the user to the appropriate stylesheet.

If I could have a single stylesheet for all resolutions, it would be a BIG help.

-b00ty

John Pollock — Sat, 03 Jun 2000 04:54:00 +0000

I think the only way to get that type of layout without tables is style sheets (which would do it only in 4+ browsers and then sometimes not perfectly), and it looks as though you have that in place as well as a table alternative..

It is all written to the page with JavaScript, which will make it a little more bulky. If it could be in straight HTML it should help a little, don't know if that really helps though..