phyllis — Mon, 10 Apr 2000 20:55:00 +0000

My problem is that much of my page is dynamically written. So without Javascript enabled, you don't get the text of the article. I had thought <noscript> worked like <noframes> but I guess I'm mistaken. I do comment out the scripts, but I need to stick in an alternate somewhere. I'll just try interspersing <noscript> tags, but it seems weird to me that the definition I had for <noscript> was completely wrong. I was using this defintion:

quote:Browsers that support scripts ignore everything between the NOSCRIPT and /NOSCRIPT tags; on the other hand, browsers that do not support scripts ignore everything except what is in the NOSCRIPT section. In this way, you can create two documents in one: one that uses scripts, and a second for simple browsers.

That comes from an HTML Catalog I got online. I guess it's just wrong though. Oh well. Phyllis

RC — Mon, 10 Apr 2000 20:46:00 +0000

from what I understand about this, <noscript> should come immediately after the script for which it is providing alternate content...

it would be easier to comment out the javascript using something like

I THINK noscript functions as sort of a wierd if/else statement. I.e. if the have javascript, display a random link or if they don't..display a static link..something like that..I'm not sure that it could be used the way you are attempting. However, I could be completely wrong. Heh.