<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1002839" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1002839</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/html-css-and-javascript/cache-questions#comment-1012527</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;This isn&#039;t an answer, it&#039;s two questions  &lt;img src=&quot;http://www.webmaster-forums.com/ubb/wink.gif&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;bb-image&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the fixed portions of each page were handled with external js scripts then the server include would not be needed (which may, by convention, require inclusion with the download whether or not the load exists in a user cache).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And if fully qualified URLs are used either for includes or scripts (or other webpage bits), do some server O/S insist of loading that from its server source regardless of whether the object exists in a local cache or not?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If anyone knows -- please send e-mail to &lt;a href=&quot;mailto:bowers@idirect.com&quot;&gt;bowers@idirect.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2000 05:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>AndyB</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1012527 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/html-css-and-javascript/cache-questions#comment-1012526</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Really?&lt;br /&gt;
I didn&#039;t know that!!! So, in general, all the included files are cached, right?&lt;br /&gt;
That&#039;s so cool!!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanx a lot!!! &lt;img src=&quot;http://www.webmaster-forums.com/ubb/smile.gif&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;bb-image&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Coddy&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2000 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Coddy</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1012526 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/html-css-and-javascript/cache-questions#comment-1012525</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;&amp;gt;&quot;The browser takes all the included pages as one&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not sure what you mean here..? I thought the browser cached the included files and thus pages load faster automatically. It could depend on your cache settings though..  &lt;img src=&quot;http://www.webmaster-forums.com/ubb/smile.gif&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;bb-image&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[This message has been edited by John Pollock (edited 26 January 2000).]&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2000 22:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Pollock</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1012525 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
