<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1002681" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/crss/node/1002681</link>
    <description></description>
    <language>en</language>
          <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/html-css-and-javascript/question-checking-browser-compatability#comment-1011847</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;------------------&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://ArtsNFlies.com&quot; class=&quot;bb-url&quot;&gt;ArtsNFlies.com&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Original art, hand tied flies, unique books and gifts, &lt;em&gt;free&lt;/em&gt; sweepstakes and &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;MORE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;!&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 1999 14:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jaiem</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1011847 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title></title>
    <link>https://www.webmaster-forums.net/html-css-and-javascript/question-checking-browser-compatability#comment-1011846</link>
    <description> &lt;p&gt;One checks for individual browsers, the other checks for the existance of the object (like document.images). Generally, the object detection is better because it offers support to third party browsers which can handle the script, rather than leaving them out. Also, it tends to shorten the code.  &lt;img src=&quot;http://www.webmaster-forums.com/ubb/smile.gif&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;bb-image&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
     <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 1999 04:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Pollock</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1011846 at https://www.webmaster-forums.net</guid>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
