You are viewing this site as a guest. Join our community to get your questions answered and share knowledge. Active members may advertise and ask for a website critique.

UKweb hosting VS US web Hosting

They have: 9 posts

Joined: Dec 2008

Hy Guys,

I am newbie on the web hosting field, plz explain me the major differences between UK web hosting and US web hosting?

{links removed}

He has: 132 posts

Joined: Jun 2008

UK web hosting has its headquarters/data centers in the United Kingdom(England) Sometimes recognized with a .uk or .co.uk domain

US web hosting has its headquarters/data centers in the United States Sometimes recognized with a .us domain

Canadian web hosting has its headquarters/data centers in Canada Sometimes recognized by a .ca domain

Other than that there is little difference except what you see in almost all hosting companies having different hardware, plans, and customer service.

Hope that answers your question.

C.Moyer Learning Webmaster
It's what you learn after you know it all that counts.
~Attributed to Harry S. Truman~

decibel.places's picture

He has: 1,550 posts

Joined: Jun 2008

cmoyer wrote:
Other than that there is little difference except what you see in almost all hosting companies having different hardware, plans, and customer service.

location of your server does not matter, except perhaps in countries with tight internet controls

my hosting has data centers in the UK and the US

They have: 9 posts

Joined: Dec 2008

Hi guys,

Thanx for ur replies.
But is there any difference in their services? If there is any difference, then which one will be better foe web hosting service?

{{links removed}}

akopayan's picture

They have: 110 posts

Joined: Nov 2006

And UK hosting a bit more expensive than US.
As for services I think all depends on the company itself, for example, Innohosting.com has datacenters in US and UK but their level of providing services is high independently their DC location.

They have: 86 posts

Joined: Jun 2008

There should not be any notable difference in quality of service provided by US/UK companies.

They have: 9 posts

Joined: Dec 2008

Hi GUYS,

Thanx for replying my queries

Musson's picture

They have: 102 posts

Joined: Dec 2006

Uk hosting is costlier. But If there is a nee of UK site location, it is possible to use the service of the companies which offer UK datacenters hosting being american and with no difference in price. One of them is marblehost.com.

They have: 143 posts

Joined: Feb 2007

I would like to mention that personally I trust US-based companies like hqhost.net, vistapages.com and ahosting.biz. Frankly speaking, I have changed many hosting providers, but these ones met my expectations. You know, I have never had any downtime while dealing with them and I have good speed connectivity.

ms2134's picture

He has: 430 posts

Joined: May 2008

I like UK based hosting because i am from the UK. I prefer to host my sites using the US data centers because a majority of my website traffic tends to come the USA.

I find that the data centre location of your website hosting is best to be closer to the audience you may be trying to reach.

I have access through my hosting provider to UK and USA datacentre and can change it every now and then.

~ Mike

They have: 102 posts

Joined: Mar 2008

Personally I prefer to host my web site with American hosting providers as there are many reliable and honest companies like webintellects.com, bravehost.com and simplehelix.com. You need to look at the quality of the service and especially customer support.

NickD's picture

They have: 57 posts

Joined: May 2009

I use one.com, the customer service cannot be faulted, up time is excellent, downside is the c panel is quite basic and you cant create mysql databases
but they offer a years free hosting when you register a domain with them.

They have: 1 posts

Joined: Aug 2009

You will find if you are UK based company who hosts their site in America with a .com domain name then you will not appear in a search on Google.co.uk pages from the UK, if you have a .co.uk TLD then it will be OK to host in the US.

I prefer to Host UK sites on UK servers, you can't go wrong then.

They have: 13 posts

Joined: Aug 2009

No there is as such no difference in service. all are same, with a little modifications in the costing. I can explain it to you with an example. They are just like the telecom service providers, that are all functionally same, but has separate brand names, locations, towers, and plans. I hope now it is clear for you.

They have: 15 posts

Joined: Aug 2009

In my experience it's cheaper in dollars than in pounds.

It's not all that straight forward though.

If you do a whois for sites hosted by UK based hosting companies, you'll find that for price reasons, many of their actual servers are in Germany.

Similarly, for most of my .com sites I've used a cheap Canadian based hosting company for years, but all their servers are actually in the USA.

Google (and possibly others) does take note of where a server is, so if you are wanting the majority of your customers to come from the UK, it's good SEO practice to get a .co.uk name with a uk based server.

Similarly, if you want to target the USA, it's best to get a .com address that's actually hosted in the USA.

They have: 26 posts

Joined: Oct 2009

There is no any difference between UKweb hosting and US web Hosting.
The quality level is depend on the service provider only.

davecoventry's picture

He has: 114 posts

Joined: Jun 2009

Generally UK web hosting tends to be more specialised and more expensive.

I used UKlinux.net for eight or nine years and they cost me around 300 GBP per year.

For the last year or so I've been using hostmonster and am very happy with their service so far. Plus they are around 70 USD per year. See the link in my sig for what they offer.

UKlinux were fairly inexpensive at the time I joined them, but prices elsewhere have come down dramatically.

I'm not recommending my hosts anymore until they sort out my hacked sites