Traffic From Experience

New Content Sources have been added

I wonder if you work for them..

Dude, your own site isn't even optimised well. I laughed my *** off at the testimonials..

"I am an experienced webmaster and I was skeptical - Now I am amazed.."

Glen H"

Are you joking?

-Rob

I am sorry you feel this way but the product does in fact work.

If you would take the time to evaluate it and see its worth you might think twice.

Meta tags analysis.
Title: Title meta tag contains no errors.
This tag contains 66 characters.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title relevancy to page content is excellent.
The Title relevancy to page content is 100%.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Description: Description meta tag contains no errors.
This tag contains 174 characters.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description relevancy to page content is good.
The Description relevancy to page content is 90%.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Keywords: Keyword relevancy to page content is terrible.
The keywords relevancy to page content is 0%.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robots: The Robots meta tag contains no errors.
This tag contains 3 characters.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Author: Found no author meta tag.
This tag is not really required but helps for your (company) name recognizing.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well not to be mistaken, when this software is used incorrectly it is TERRIBLE and nothing more then a Doorway generator.

But when used properly meaning you have changed the defaults and created a decent template like the video shows you...

It is super effective and does create quite a bit of traffic but more important is the QUALITY of traffic it creates.

sketchy for me

The articles they have put forth are very useful in conjunction with the software...

Google Tips
http://www.nerdlib.com/google_tips.phpp

Marketing
http://www.nerdlib.com/marketing_tips.php

Search Engine Scoring System
http://www.nerdlib.com/seo_tips.php

Spider Friendly Pages
http://www.nerdlib.com/spider_friendly.php

Landing Page Guide
http://www.nerdlib.com/landing_pages.php

Reciprocal Linking Guide
http://www.nerdlib.com/reciprocal_linking.php

So we have decided to put out a set of sample sites created with Maximum Traffic. We have included Google Adsense in some of these basic examples to show the usage of javascript. You can include any language you want in your template.

Here are the Sample Site

looks appealing, but the reason i do all my SEO manually is the tendancy for google to suddenly catch on to the software's algo and remove sites. I wouldn't be surprised if someone in google doesn't alreayd own this software and is "testing" it.

I didn't get it. Either you want me to visit your site to learn something or are you talking about bathroom grafeedi? Concentrate online. It's way more cost effective and stink free.

Matt Hughes

techniner wrote: OK I have been in this business for quite some time.

I have been sucked into scams of "targetted Traffic" and all the nonsense.

These are simple 404'd domains.. proxied Traffic.. or just garbage redirects you simply do not want..

If your looking to simply inflate numbers and not have real visitors by all means waste your Money..

PPC's will work well if you have a unique enough product...

Now the next option I came across a couple of months back and I swear by it..

I have used it on EVERY site I have worked on.

And every client I have dealt with LOVES the results.....

You can use this info.. or just take it into the bathroom and... well you get the idea..

But anyway..

http://nerdlib.com/

getting goood internet traffic for little work is a myth.... SEO software grabs the attentions of lazy webmasters how think work is too good for them..thats my opinion....lol :blech:

I'll definitely take a closer look at those URL's you mentioned.