Role of Meta Tags
Hello Everybody,
What is the role of meta tags in the search engines. Can meta tags improve our SERP. Please Reply me with satisfied answer.
Find us on Facebook
Connect with other TWF members on Facebook! We'll also let you know about new articles and interesting forum discussions.
Megan posted this at 14:03 — 27th April 2009.
She has: 11,282 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
The <title> tag is by far the most important meta tag. This has a great bearing on your search results and whether users click through to your site.
<meta> description isn't used for ranking in most engines but may be displayed in the results. This might help to encourage people to click through to your site.
<meta> keywords might be used a little bit in some engines but are largely ignored.
<meta> robots can be used to tell search engines not to index parts of your site (sometimes useful, but better to do this through robots.txt so you have all your noindexed urls listed in one place)
Other meta tags, like author and date, are ignored by most search engines.
Here's a good reference:
http://searchenginewatch.com/2167931
Megan
Connect with us on Facebook!
My web design blog | Follow me on Twitter
Misa21 posted this at 06:13 — 29th April 2009.
They have: 136 posts
Joined: Jul 2008
Well said.. I think this explains it all..
motioncontroller posted this at 16:40 — 27th April 2009.
They have: 5 posts
Joined: Apr 2009
Even though the meta keywords aren't as important, I still enter them for new articles that I write. I've found it to be beneficial to write them out after the article is completed, because it helps me see if I've covered all the keywords that I set out to.
webwiz posted this at 19:15 — 27th April 2009.
He has: 635 posts
Joined: May 2007
All very good points, I think.
@motioncontroller has an interesting thought. My CMS of choice (Textpattern) allows you to add keywords to every post. Not only do these go in the META tag, but also in the database for use by the search engine.
Nice one.
Cordially, David
--
delete from internet where user_agent="MSIE" and version < 8;
Megan posted this at 20:46 — 27th April 2009.
She has: 11,282 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
That leads to another point - that an internal search engine for your site using whatever CMS you're using may use meta keywords. Could be useful for your personal use even if you don't use that search publicly. Although I have no idea how those search tools generally work - would be good to google that sometime
I think it's often useful to put in meta keywords anyway, just don't expect the major search engines to use them for ranking.
Megan
Connect with us on Facebook!
My web design blog | Follow me on Twitter
decibel.places posted this at 11:31 — 28th April 2009.
He has: 1,497 posts
Joined: Jun 2008
My CMS of choice also has configurable meta tags/keywords by contrib module on the page and in the db. Not only that, but the page title (presumably important and keyword-rich) is used about 4 times on the page view.
In fact, there is a free one-hour 5 part tutorial about my CMS of choice and SEO.
benallos posted this at 16:48 — 28th April 2009.
They have: 1 posts
Joined: Apr 2009
The title tag is the most important one of all the meta tags ...
webwiz posted this at 00:40 — 29th April 2009.
He has: 635 posts
Joined: May 2007
One more meta tag I just found important, though not for SEO - http-equiv="Content-Type".
I use UTF-8 encoding on all HTML these days. Everything looked okay on a page I put up yesterday-- that is, until I looked in Internet Explorer. All the Unicode characters were borked. The reason? I had misspelled "UTF-8" as "UTF8" as my charset.
Correcting the spelling fixed IE. You can never trust some browsers!
Cordially, David
--
delete from internet where user_agent="MSIE" and version < 8;
decibel.places posted this at 02:49 — 29th April 2009.
He has: 1,497 posts
Joined: Jun 2008
I always thought
<title></title>is an element of the document in the DOM, not a "meta" tag - it doesn't even have "meta" in the tag.Also, document.title can be manipulated with javascript
I agree that the title tag is important, I just do not think it is a "meta" tag
greg posted this at 03:52 — 29th April 2009.
He has: 1,558 posts
Joined: Nov 2005
Signature links on this forum are NO-follow! - This means spam is futile!
decibel.places posted this at 13:31 — 30th April 2009.
He has: 1,497 posts
Joined: Jun 2008
so....
<title>is an HTML element and not a META tag, but it contains META dataMegan posted this at 13:44 — 30th April 2009.
She has: 11,282 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
Yes, but it's usually included with the term "Meta tags" when you're talking about SEO. It is a tag that describes metadata.
I used to think as you did as well - it's not a
<meta>tag, but when you realize the context it makes sense.Megan
Connect with us on Facebook!
My web design blog | Follow me on Twitter
decibel.places posted this at 14:52 — 30th April 2009.
He has: 1,497 posts
Joined: Jun 2008
<meta>tag, but when you realize the context it makes sense.I still think as I do - technically
<title>is NOT a META tag, but it contains META dataMegan posted this at 15:11 — 30th April 2009.
She has: 11,282 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
So what's the difference between a "meta tag" and a "tag that contains meta data?". There may be a difference with
<meta>tags, but they are considered to be a subset of "Meta tags" (or "tags that contain meta data" - "Meta tags" is just eaiser to talk about)Really, you can argue about the technicalities all day but this has become the convention and it's clear enough when you understand it.
Megan
Connect with us on Facebook!
My web design blog | Follow me on Twitter
decibel.places posted this at 17:59 — 30th April 2009.
He has: 1,497 posts
Joined: Jun 2008
because the
<title>tag is NOT the same as the META NAME="Title" tag:Megan posted this at 19:22 — 30th April 2009.
She has: 11,282 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
So? that dosn't mean that
("Meta tag" meaning "tag that contains metadata").
<title>is not a meta tag. It it's not a<meta>tag but it's still a meta tagWe could start talking about this like "The role of tags that contain metadata" or "The role of metadata" but that's just being overly pedantic. Including it in this category also helps to focus the discussion (
<title>being important,<meta>keywords and description not so much etc.).Megan
Connect with us on Facebook!
My web design blog | Follow me on Twitter
decibel.places posted this at 21:27 — 30th April 2009.
He has: 1,497 posts
Joined: Jun 2008
<title>is the document title<META NAME="Title"is the META tag for the titlethe fact that most search bots retrieve the
<title>value is NOT the same as setting it with the<META NAME="Title"tag -as the article snippet I posted makes clear
we should talk about META tags and ALSO emphasize the importance of the
<title>tag -- but it is NOT a META tag!Megan posted this at 13:33 — 1st May 2009.
She has: 11,282 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
<title>tag -- but it is NOT a META tag!Yes it is. It's a tag that contains metadata. If that's the case, then why is it not a "Meta tag"? Just because it doesn't start with
<meta?<META NAME="Title"is the<meta>tag for the title. (which almost no one actually uses so the point is kind of moot)We are using the same word to describe two different things - meta tags and
<meta>tags. All<meta>tags are meta tags but not all meta tags are<meta>tags.You're just taking a strict approach where all meta tags must be
<meta>tags.Megan
Connect with us on Facebook!
My web design blog | Follow me on Twitter
decibel.places posted this at 16:15 — 1st May 2009.
He has: 1,497 posts
Joined: Jun 2008
yes I'm taking a strict approach - but for a reason
if you read the article I posted - http://www.webmarketingnow.com/tips/meta-title.html - you will learn that search bots may process the title and meta title tags differently - so they are not identical
I think that we should use the term meta tags for the tags with meta in them, and recognize that other html doc elements are also important for SEO; your logic could also lead to calling h1 and h2 tags "meta" tags because they supply important SEO information!
the
<title>tag is in the same boat with the h1 and h2 tags - it is an HTML document element - the fact that there is ALSO a meta title tag is confusing, but does not change the fact that<title>is a document element and not a meta tag!have you looked at your own document head tags?
<title>Role of Meta Tags | The Webmaster Forums</title>...
<meta name="DC.Title" content="Role of Meta Tags" />
you are using both the title and meta title tags - and notice that they are not identical!
meta name="DC.Title" is a Dublin Core variant of the meta title tag
Megan posted this at 17:11 — 1st May 2009.
She has: 11,282 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
I never said they were.
That's not the logic. It's got little to do with whether something is important for SEO or not. The argument is that
<title>contains metadata and can therefore be considred a "meta tag". It is not displayed in the browser window (as part of browser chrome, but not on the page itself) whereas headers are displayed on the page, and are therefore not metadata.<title>is a document element and not a meta tag!It's a tag that contains metadata, so why is it not a "meta tag"?
So what's that got to do with it? Yes, there is a
<metatitle tag as well as a<title>tag. That still doesn't mean that the<title>tag does not contain metadata and is therfore not a meta tag.(And those are the tags for this site, not something I deliberately put there. Most of the development of this site was not done by me, just FYI.)
Do you ever let things drop or do you keep going until someone else does?
Megan
Connect with us on Facebook!
My web design blog | Follow me on Twitter
decibel.places posted this at 21:33 — 1st May 2009.
He has: 1,497 posts
Joined: Jun 2008
I said - erroneously - that the title tag contains meta data. It does not. It contains the document title.
The meta tags contain meta data, but
<title>is not a meta tag. It does not contain meta data.The reason the distinction is important, is that the search engines may use title and meta title values differently. That is the only point I have been trying to make.
Officer, but I swear I did not put the bullets in that gun...
...and I wonder, why would you have meta tags that you do not choose?
anyway, this entire aside could have been avoided had you said something like this in your first post:
see what I mean?
btw, RankQuest has an interesting tool - "Lynx View" - some of us old-timers remember the text-only Lynx Browser, released a whole year before Mozilla! Anyway, RankQuest's point is that this is how a spider may see your site, text-only (and for that matter, screen readers for the visually impaired) so here is the Lynx View for this site's front page - and yes, there are the contents of the title tag on the first line!
and no, I will not concede to an argument that is blatantly wrong
of course I have a great deal of respect for you, Megan, or I would not bother...
that, and I like seeing these threads get ridiculously narrow
Megan posted this at 14:49 — 2nd May 2009.
She has: 11,282 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
The meta tags contain meta data, but
<title>is not a meta tag. It does not contain meta data.Well now you're getting somewhere! My argument was based on the assumption that the
<title>contains metadata.(By the way, what I've been arguing here isn't necessarily my actual opinion - I'm just debating a point.)
Because JeevesBond installed the Meta tag module and it put it there. JeevesBond does the development on this site, not me so don't point fingers.
Dropping an argument doesn't mean a person concedes - it may mean they're bored of the whole topic and can't be bothered to talk about it anymore. Or they realize that there's no point in arguing with someone who won't consider the other side. Or they have better things to do. Or they really don't care that much. Just in case that appens to you again in the future
Megan
Connect with us on Facebook!
My web design blog | Follow me on Twitter
decibel.places posted this at 18:27 — 2nd May 2009.
He has: 1,497 posts
Joined: Jun 2008
haha - as quoted below by greg, the W3C recognizes that the
<title>tag DOES contain meta data...This has been an interesting exploration into the behind-the-scenes activity in the head of an HTML document.
Honestly, before this thread, I never contemplated whether or not
<title>is a meta tag - of course I recognized it is essential for SEO, but never thought deeply about its structural properties.I think I am satisfied that I have pointed out:
1.
<title>is not a META tag2.
<meta name="title" etcIS a meta tag that describes the title, often has the same value as<title>(on my personal Drupal site they are the same value), but may have a slightly different value for fine tuning some aspects of SEO.Regarding the META tags module, I assumed that Jeeves handled that, but it is irresponsible to say "I did not program that part of MY site, so I do not take responsibility" - IMO you as mod/webmistress are responsible for all aspects of this site (but that could be another debate entirely)
Anyway, I'm NOT satisfied that we have made this part of the thread minimally narrow yet
Besides, I am a Taurus - my birthday
is on Tuesday, Cinco de Mayo
so I am stubborn like a bull!
Megan posted this at 19:27 — 2nd May 2009.
She has: 11,282 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
<title>tag DOES contain meta data...So, if it contains meta data, then why is it not a meta tag?
Me neither, and I really don't care that much, to be honest.
It's not "my" site it's "our" site. He does the development, I take care of the community. And I could go on about how I hope the community feels some ownership of the site as well.
I'm not denying responsibility. Although, I don't know what I'm supposed to be "taking responsibility" for. For having a meta title?? So what? I don't know what you're trying to get at here - why is it a problem for you that we had a meta title?
I admit that didn't know it was there, but then there are a lot of things that go on here that I'm not fully aware of. I do have a full time job and a life, you know.
Megan
Connect with us on Facebook!
My web design blog | Follow me on Twitter
decibel.places posted this at 21:26 — 2nd May 2009.
He has: 1,497 posts
Joined: Jun 2008
It is not a META tag because it is not a META tag - it does not open
<meta ...However, the W3C recognizes that the
<title>tag may "handle" meta data. That does not mean that<title>IS a META tag...Megan, I was only kidding about your "responsibility" for your meta tags
but I thought your response was kind of off-kilter, rather than, "Oh really, we have those tags? How interesting..."
Like I said, I have a birthday on Tuesday (yup, 39 again...
) and by the time one reaches my age, I would hope that the reflex to be defensive regardless of the truth diminishes.
I find this discussion interesting in a structuralist way, also because I am asked to tweak sites for SEO and thus I am very aware of the role of the
<title>and meta description tags, but never thought much about or even used the<meta name="title"...tag much. I am interested in a deeply philosophical way, the last thing I care about is "winning"(gettin' narrower with each post!!!)
greg posted this at 08:30 — 3rd May 2009.
He has: 1,558 posts
Joined: Nov 2005
I think I have a similar approach as you do with attitude, i.e. it's only a discussion so there's no need to get worked up..etc.
And people should take for granted that you are not being abrupt or nasty. I'm the same, and within my close friends and family that works well as we are all the same - just get on with it.
But sometimes, especially on a forum where facial expressions, tone of voice and body language are not present, you have to go a bit out of your way to show you are not attacking someone or being obnoxious.
Also, can we continue this discussion down the bottom? The post widths and quotes are becoming ridiculously small now.
)
(He waits for a reply directly on this one
Signature links on this forum are NO-follow! - This means spam is futile!
decibel.places posted this at 15:42 — 3rd May 2009.
He has: 1,497 posts
Joined: Jun 2008
sorry, I can be arrogant and brusque at times, but I have a good heart and don't mean to hurt anybody's feelings
sometimes I feel persecuted too, remember that I have feelings too (but a tough skin) - so when I am "attacked" (or I perceive that I am) I bite back!
I want to preserve a collegial and pleasant tone on these forums, so I will be extra-careful to be diplomatic in future posts.
(He waits for a reply directly on this one
You know me well
gadget_monkey posted this at 06:00 — 29th April 2009.
They have: 9 posts
Joined: Apr 2009
I think all meta tags are important.
it is for the meta crawlers or Google bots use
in order to asses your website.
articlemaster posted this at 13:13 — 30th April 2009.
They have: 83 posts
Joined: Apr 2009
meta tag plays a very important role in search engine optimization and by the help of this meta tags any search engine crawler able to crawl your sites meta data and list or index your site in their search engine directory and after it people can search your site by using these meta keywords, so keywords are very helpful and it also help you to drive good and fresh traffic to your site and it will help you in getting good page rank also.
Article Submission
greg posted this at 10:44 — 2nd May 2009.
He has: 1,558 posts
Joined: Nov 2005
I wasn't going to get involved, but ...
I'm not taking sides here either btw, I like it up here on the fence.
DP, your argument logic is this:
A single piece of wood floating on the sea is not a boat, even though it possesses some of the qualities that the definition of a boat has, such as it floats and is on the sea.
You have the same logic with meta argument, claiming that simply because a
<title>tag has meta data in it doesn't make it SPECIFICALLY a "meta tag".And Megan's argument is the opposite, that is BECAUSE the
<title>tag has meta data is therefore a meta tag.Now, getting off the fence for a minute.
BOTH a
<meta>tag and a<title>tag have metadata, and therefore both are meta elements.However, being totally precise I would have to say that a
<title>tag is not a meta tag as it is not in a "<meta>tag", and based on the premise that if anything, it is a title tag with metadata.An element with tag name of "META" expresses meta-data about a given HTML document, but that doesn't mean that an element with a tag of
<title>is a meta tag simply because it has metadata.Many things within HTML have metadata, but that doesn't make those elements "
<meta>tags".A
<meta>tag is a meta tag.<meta http-equiv="description"...><meta http-equiv="keywords"...>
<meta http-equiv="content-type"...>
Are all meta tags as they contain data about data within a meta tag, that is
<meta>tag.On that basis, a HTML element tag "type" is defined by what tag type it is.
<b>is a bold tag,<a>is an anchor tag ...<meta>is a meta tag and therefore<title>is a title tag, and not a meta tag.Although it's not "entirely" black and white, and therefore (getting back on the fence) I would say opinion is allowed to a certain degree in this occasion.
Signature links on this forum are NO-follow! - This means spam is futile!
decibel.places posted this at 12:47 — 2nd May 2009.
He has: 1,497 posts
Joined: Jun 2008
hey greg! thanks for joining the debate!
<meta>tag and a<title>tag have metadata, and therefore both are meta elementsNo,
<title>does NOT contain meta data (although I suggested that in error). It contains the document title, which may be the same or similar as the value of the meta title tag.It is NOT a meta tag and does NOT contain meta data - so therefore it is not a meta tag or a tag that is acting like a meta tag.
That is my point of view.
It is not a boat,
I would say it is circumstantial that the title tag generally has the same or similar value as the meta title tag. Because they both deal with the document title.
However, the key difference is that the title tag defines the document title, while the meta title tag describes the document title.
greg posted this at 13:40 — 2nd May 2009.
He has: 1,558 posts
Joined: Nov 2005
<title>does NOT contain meta dataSignature links on this forum are NO-follow! - This means spam is futile!
decibel.places posted this at 18:33 — 2nd May 2009.
He has: 1,497 posts
Joined: Jun 2008
So I was actually correct when I said that
<title>contains metadata...for the record, that is the TITLE element
the title attribute is used to add title info to an element (which may be displayed as a tooltip on hover) eg:
<img src="http://www.w3.org/Talks/Tools/Slidy/keys.jpg" title="W3C logo" />greg posted this at 19:34 — 2nd May 2009.
He has: 1,558 posts
Joined: Nov 2005
<title>contains metadata...erm....
<title>does NOT contain meta data (although I suggested that in error).You did originally, but argued against me with it when I stated it. Now you are back to saying it does
You know it's Saturday right? And this is ... Earth?
the title attribute is used to add title info to an element (which may be displayed as a tooltip on hover) eg:
< >. My using<title>clearly references the meta element in the document head that determines the document title. "TITLE" is simply a textual reference for<title>, and "title" is a textual reference for element based titles (title="").As you are supposed to use lowercase letters for tags I think the textual representation using uppercase for an actual tag is a bad idea, and may well confuse newcomers. W3C should have a slap on the wrist.
Signature links on this forum are NO-follow! - This means spam is futile!
decibel.places posted this at 21:14 — 2nd May 2009.
He has: 1,497 posts
Joined: Jun 2008
I was not correcting anything, I was pointing out the difference between the
<title>tag as an element of the document, and the title="some text" attribute, for the sake of anybody who may be following this (hopefully nobody).During the course of this debate, I have managed to go to the gym, go to synagogue twice, repot some plants and otherwise enjoy life... as well as post some DHTML code on d.o. and manage 2 or 3 other projects, and answer some other posts here.
greg posted this at 20:55 — 3rd May 2009.
He has: 1,558 posts
Joined: Nov 2005
What do you want, a Blue Peter badge?
sometimes I feel persecuted too, remember that I have feelings too (but a tough skin) - so when I am "attacked" (or I perceive that I am) I bite back!
That's NOT a case of "you started it" but people in general tend to respond in a similar manner in which they themselves had been approached in.
Someone politely asks me the time, I smile and tell them. Someone physically shoves me out of the way rudely, they get shoved back twice as hard. This is life, and I believe a very apt phrase goes well here...
"Don't dish it out if you can't take it!"
If you feel you have been attacked and ganged up on, then that is your own doing for not going out of your way to ensure you ARE polite to people and make them understand you are being helpful.
Hell, it can be easy enough in real life to ensure you come across as civilised, in a forum you only have to not press the "Submit" until you have calmed down a bit and changed your angry reply to rational and civilised response.
It's not realistic at all claiming you are arrogant within your forum posts as it's not like you have to instantly respond. In fact, you don't have to respond at all. Bite your virtual tongue!
In this thread (linked), you were actually wrong, and you missed the point entirely. Instead of quickly replying and pushing forward the argument you have stuck in your head, take a moment and think "wait, have I missed something?".
I nearly didn't post this in fear you will debate it even more, and start arguing it all over again or argue the fact you were not wrong.
Let it go, forget it, move on to something else.
There are quite a few threads of yours of recent that you start splitting off into a debate about something off topic and completely unrelated, or correcting people's spellings or generally causing havoc in a thread.
I know others debate back with you, myself included, but a two way response is fine .. someone picks out a potential fault in an opinion or advice, then the other person responds.
And that's fine but you just wont leave it alone and insist on debating back your side of the argument in every thread. Sure, once every-so-often is acceptable if the debate could be related to the topic or further assist the OP somehow. But not in the majority of threads you post in, that's not fair to the OP or the forum.
And just debating "I am right" over and over again in multiple threads throughout the forum ruins "other people's" threads.
It really has to stop as it's unfair on others, and as you are a decent regular member, like myself and others, you will surely want the forum to be a decent place.
Growling at people, especially newcomers, is detrimental to the forum in general, and often to other people's feelings.
You claimed "I have feelings too", well so do other people! Although, it's not about "feelings" it's about being civilised and keeping comments informative and related to the topic.
sambitha, the OP, hasn't actually posted since their opening the thread, yet you have managed to tell us about going to the gym, your gardening habits and all the other things you have done recently.
Please, don't reply with arguments or anything off-topic as it will just get unpublished.
Seriously, life's too short to argue over everything all the time.
Take what I have just said and choose to ignore it, laugh at it or take something from it. Regardless of what you choose, don't respond to it unless it is relevant to "Role of Meta Tags", i.e. the topic of this thread!
End of off topic discussion.
Signature links on this forum are NO-follow! - This means spam is futile!
dani posted this at 04:47 — 22nd June 2010.
They have: 51 posts
Joined: May 2010
Meta tag will increase SERP. But Its should be optimized perfectly.
Bluejet posted this at 12:39 — 22nd July 2010.
They have: 12 posts
Joined: Jul 2010
meta tags can help you to target your chosen keywords
Sabrina178 posted this at 06:13 — 3rd August 2010.
They have: 14 posts
Joined: Aug 2010
simply put,
content is for the human visitors
meta tags and all on-page factors are for the spiders
paulwalker posted this at 12:51 — 22nd September 2010.
They have: 25 posts
Joined: Sep 2010
Meta tags are HTML codes that are inserted into the header on a web page, after the title tag. They take a variety of forms and serve a variety of purposes, but in the context of search engine optimization when people refer to meta tags, they are usually referring to the meta description tag and the meta keywords tag.
The meta description tag and the meta keywords tag were proposed so that webmasters would have a consistent method for providing meta document data to user agents, such as search engines. Unfortunately, so many unscrupulous webmasters have abused the meta description and meta keywords tag that search engines have had to de-emphasize their importance.
iPhone App Development | Hire iPhone App Developer | iPhone Game Development | iPhone Theme Development
admansmith posted this at 14:02 — 22nd September 2011.
They have: 3 posts
Joined: Sep 2011
meta tag is used at website for visibility of content at search engine, search engine crawl the content according to meta tag, due to good meta tag 60% work has been completed for SEO.
Flights to Bangkok, Cheap Flights to Manila, Flights to New Delhi, Flights to Johannesburg from London
Brenda24 posted this at 07:35 — 28th September 2011.
They have: 5 posts
Joined: Sep 2011
All the meta tags are really important as the SERP really depends largely on how well the Meta tags are made...
medicareprodct posted this at 09:12 — 28th September 2011.
They have: 11 posts
Joined: Aug 2011
Thanks all for sharing such a nice info...
suchismita posted this at 04:50 — 29th September 2011.
They have: 46 posts
Joined: Sep 2011
Role of meta tag:
*Meta tag is the great way to boost the search engine ranking in your web site
*Meta tags will help us to get more traffic in your web site
*Mete tag In SEO help us to get good ranking
*Meta tag is a way to get Information in your web site
Android app developer||Android app developers||Joomla Development
suchismita posted this at 05:04 — 29th September 2011.
They have: 46 posts
Joined: Sep 2011
meta tag is used mainly in search Engine Optimization for Increase the traffic rate..
Steve Marker posted this at 23:16 — 13th October 2011.
They have: 19 posts
Joined: Oct 2011
All the meta tags are really important as the SERP really depends largely on how well the Meta tags are made...
raisa.nadia posted this at 09:46 — 20th October 2011.
They have: 3 posts
Joined: Oct 2011
Meta tag is one of the important factor of SEO. It is used for the visibility of the contents of web search engine, search engine to index the contents of the meta-tags.
Metal Stencils
castrogene posted this at 14:08 — 21st October 2011.
They have: 6 posts
Joined: Oct 2011
For Google' crawlers meta tag is the most important thing as when a surfer fires a search query in the Google search engine, it will fetch the result from indexed database based on the search query & the most appropriate & relevant meta tags. so meta tags are quite important in on-page optimization/SEO
Nanacast Review | Nanacast Bonus
lavinbatra posted this at 09:47 — 22nd October 2011.
He has: 2 posts
Joined: Oct 2011
Google always check for meta tags while crawling and indexing.
Want to join the discussion? Create an account or log in if you already have one. Joining is fast, free and painless! We’ll even whisk you back here when you’ve finished.