Which do you think are better? Gif's or Jpeg's?
I like Gif's myself. 256 colors is max for any image i put on the web, anymore then that would mean horrific load times. And with error diffusion, the imagelook good and have good load times.
But i was also wondering, is, i hear stuff about png, i think thats it anyways, i was wondering, if theres anything good about that type.?
Ken Prescott - TWF Moderator
21Studios freelancing design - [url="http://www.graphic-forums.com/index.php?referrerid=1
"]Graphic-Forums[/url] - The Forums for the Graphic User






Megan posted this at 20:29 — 5th November 2000.
She has: 10,228 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
GIF and JPEG both have their advantages and disadvantages. Photographs look terrible as gif's for example, and anything with hard edges (text, for example) looks bad as a JPEG.
I'm not an expert on PNG or anything, but it seems to be a really good alternative to the other two. It's vector based, which means that it'll render hard edges really well. Maybe someone else could explain it better - I should do some reading up on it.
Are there any browsers that support it yet? NS 6 maybe? It's not really practical to use on the web yet because the common browsers don't support it...
P.S. Shouldn't this be in the Graphics & Design forum?
Megan
My web design blog
Jim Shilt posted this at 22:35 — 5th November 2000.
They have: 268 posts
Joined: May 1999
Both 4.0 and up browsers support PNG. I don't use it for photo type graphics as it is quite large. Looks good to replace GIF thou.
My goal in life is found in Phillipians 4:8-9
shoutingrock.org/troop214
Parker posted this at 02:42 — 6th November 2000.
They have: 883 posts
Joined: Feb 2000
I like GIF. Good load times and it doesn't look as bad as Jpeg
Josh Simpson posted this at 04:40 — 6th November 2000.
They have: 147 posts
Joined: Dec 1999
It is sposed to have 256 different transparences, so that means partial transparence, but this is currently no fully surported by all browers
JLS (Joshua Lee Simpson)
mjames posted this at 13:48 — 7th November 2000.
They have: 2,064 posts
Joined: Dec 1999
GIFs are better in most cases, with the exception of photographs, where JPEG's are best.
NSS posted this at 14:31 — 7th November 2000.
They have: 488 posts
Joined: Feb 2000
From my experience use GIF when your file size is 30k and below.
JPEG would be more suitable with 40k and above file size.
Hope this helps
Justin S posted this at 14:47 — 7th November 2000.
They have: 2,076 posts
Joined: Jun 1999
I use GIF images for all my web graphics except for photographs which I keep in JPG format for better picture quality. I'm gonna go look into PNG though...
Justin Stayton - [email] [icq]
Grandmaster posted this at 15:56 — 7th November 2000.
They have: 677 posts
Joined: Mar 1999
Justin, Wouldn't you want to use .bmp for photgraphs, that doesnt take away any quality does it?
But everytime you open up a JPG and save it it looses some of the quality. I read that somewhere.
Ken Prescott - TWF Moderator
21Studios freelancing design - [url="http://www.graphic-forums.com/index.php?referrerid=1
"]Graphic-Forums[/url] - The Forums for the Graphic User
anti posted this at 16:51 — 7th November 2000.
They have: 453 posts
Joined: Jan 1999
Use JPEG for "natural" pictures (photos, etc.)
Use PNG for the rest (logos, buttons...).
I stopped using GIFs two years ago and never got complaints.
All major browsers support PNG.
Why (not) use PNG and not GIF?
+ PNGs are smaller
+ PNGs can be hi/true-color
+ PNGs are not based on the LZW-algorithm (which is still patented by Unisys!!!)
- PNGs can't be animated
The last one is a big drawback, especially for banners,
but since I don't own a licensed Grafix-Application I have no choice.
anti
get your free webmail account at:
http://freemail.webhome.de/
Grandmaster posted this at 17:25 — 7th November 2000.
They have: 677 posts
Joined: Mar 1999
Who/What Invented PNG?
How do you go about inventing a image format anyways?
What are the other formats that can be used on the web?
Ken Prescott - TWF Moderator
21Studios freelancing design - [url="http://www.graphic-forums.com/index.php?referrerid=1
"]Graphic-Forums[/url] - The Forums for the Graphic User
anat posted this at 14:44 — 9th November 2000.
They have: 304 posts
Joined: Dec 1999
Don't use bmp in a web site. The file size is scary! I always use jpg for photos. Loss of quality can be controlled by most graphics software (e.g. PhotoShop). It depends on the picture, but you can very often reduce file size without losing any quality. I got that one from my dad and he should know - he's in the printing industry and they use PhotoShop all the time.
All4Content.com - Add quality content to your web site for FREE!
TheCatSite.com - The website for cat lovers.
trungson posted this at 05:06 — 15th November 2000.
They have: 9 posts
Joined: Feb 2000
Just wondering if the patent for GIF will be free for programmer. PNG to me is good, but not very popular, but it will.
Son
http://new.123finder.com/ - Need suggestions for your new cool domains? Try it FREE now.
http://www.ad-rotator.com/ - FREE ad serving & management system for small businesses/websites