I realize this is a very hot topic - but was wondering what most here thought about the need to have a renewed investigation of 9/11? There is increasing evidence that the 9/11 commission did not do nearly a sufficient job of investigating the facts.
A recent zogby poll showed that 70 million Americans feel that the investigation should be reopened.... so this is not a "fringe" or "tin hat" opinion.
Not here to pick a fight, or make anyone upset. Just asking.
Renegade posted this at 06:53 — 15th July 2006.
He has: 2,944 posts
Joined: Oct 2002
Well, the way I see it, if this case is opened up, more people are going to die needlessly. It will just be another reason for someone to declare war on someone else...
Cheng Eu Chew - Renegade
Download:
- Mozilla, Firefox
- Opera
This post may contain peanut traces
Wordplay posted this at 12:18 — 15th July 2006.
They have: 19 posts
Joined: Jun 2006
Hmmm. I haven't heard that take before.
Renegade, there are many who feel that multiple thousands have died
needlessly as a result of the Bush administration lying us into an illegal
war, using 9/11 as a pretense.
9/11 has also been used as the reason for the decimation of
American liberties through the so called "Patriot Act".
There are a disturbing number of unanswered questions as to
how the events of September 11, 2001, the worst crime in
American history, actually came about.
How is finding out the truth going to make things worse?
Please elaborate on your view point. Thank you.
steve40 posted this at 12:42 — 15th July 2006.
He has: 495 posts
Joined: May 2005
Does anyone remember Hitler burned down the chancellery in Burlin, to start a war with Poland??. :eek:
Reason World Peace? (yeah).
Wordplay posted this at 03:39 — 16th July 2006.
They have: 19 posts
Joined: Jun 2006
Yes, Steve40, also known as the "Reichstag fire". Just one of many "false flag"operations, perpetrated by world governments, including the US.
steve40 posted this at 11:35 — 16th July 2006.
He has: 495 posts
Joined: May 2005
There is a high possibility of a comparison there.
(Reason OIL)
Wordplay posted this at 14:13 — 16th July 2006.
They have: 19 posts
Joined: Jun 2006
Steve40 said:
"There is a high possibility of a comparison there.
(Reason OIL)"
Right, but from what I've studied, the main reason for the war in Iraq is
not so we'll have more oil, but so the availabilty of oil coming out of
Iraq can be controlled. By controlling the availablity of oil,
they control the price.
Back to my original question: Because of the myriad of unanswered questions that
the 9/11 Commission did not cover, should the investigation of 9/11 be reopened?
One example of the many questions: Why did a third building, WTC 7, collapse that day
(even though it was not hit by a plane)? It had a couple of fires, and supposedly
had some damage to it's south side, but neither of these situations can account for
a complete, vertical collapse occuring at free-fall speed. And keep in mind: no steel frame
buildings have ever collapsed due to fire in history... and THREE collapsed in one day
on 9/11.
steve40 posted this at 17:24 — 16th July 2006.
He has: 495 posts
Joined: May 2005
If you watched closely that day, you may have noticed just before the collapse, liquid seemed to be spilling out from the bottom levels just under the smoke. No fuel fire would melt steel, weaken it yes, totally melt it no. Only thermite would do that.
All three of those buildings contained massive amounts of asbestos, and it would have cost more than a new building to renovate them. SO!. The oil we have mentioned is all being pumped one direction, Guess?? .
I really don't know if this thread is wise or not, we may have said enough!.
locatepeople posted this at 21:39 — 16th July 2006.
He has: 377 posts
Joined: May 2005
erm... America is the furtherst thing away from Nazi germany. I know that, and I'm not even an American. Freedom of speech and all.
I think it is a little stupid to suggest that the U.S. government killed 1000s of its citizens just to start a middle east conflict that ha sactually increased the rate of global terrorism.
As for re-opening a new investigation, I'm not entirely sure there's anything new to investigate? What would you suggest they should investigate other than what they have already done? And please outline how they would investigate - any evidence is buried under tons of rubble and has probobly been destoryed.
Trace UK People -UK People Searcher -Find People UK - Learn Martial Arts Online -Private Detective Agency - Cheap Website Design UK - Business Small
steve40 posted this at 22:25 — 16th July 2006.
He has: 495 posts
Joined: May 2005
Yes its is probably a little late now. The tons of rubble are not even there any more, most of what was left of the steel, is probably in the cars we drive around now. Yes freedom of speech, that depends on who you are talking about lately.
The patriot act took care of that!.
Hmm, we all remember Lee Oswald, Jack Ruby, and Marylin Monrow. Funny they never got to speak??. That's another bucket of worms, there has never been a satisfactory answer to. Jimmy Hoffa went on vacation, but nobody knows where. So freedom is all a mater of interpretation.
Wordplay posted this at 00:26 — 17th July 2006.
They have: 19 posts
Joined: Jun 2006
locatepeople, you said: "I don't know if there's reason to investigate."
Oh, yes there is, very much so.
Go here to see the Top 40 Reasons why there needs to be further investigation (there are many more, but this is a good start:
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041221155307646
Here are just a few of the distiguished individuals who are calling for an investigation:
Former Director of Advanced Space Programs, Development for the U.S. Air Force, under President Reagan, and combat fighter pilot Col. Robert Bowman (Caltech Phd in aeronautics and nuclear engineering).
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6900065571556128674
Professor of Physics, Brigham Young University, and co-chair of Scholars For 9/11 Truth, Steven Jones
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=964034652002408586
Former CIA Intelligence Advisor to Reagan and George HW Bush and founder of the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity, Ray McGovern
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Researchers_questioning_the_official_account_of_9/11
Aircraft crash investigation authority, USAF Col. (Ret) George Nelson
http://www.physics911.net/georgenelson.htm
Kevin Ryan, former department head at UL (Underwriter Laboratories) the company which certified the steel which went into the WTCs upon their construction, and inspected it after the WTC collapses in 2001.
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041112144051451
Former assistant secretary of the U.S. Treasury Senior Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Research Fellow at Stanford's Independent Institute, and former associate editor of the Wall Street Journal, Paul Craig Roberts
http://www.wanttoknow.info/050908insidejob911#roberts
Canadian National Defense Minister, the Honourable Paul Hellyer
http://www.septembereleventh.org/kc/multimedia/movies/Hellyer.mov
Professor of mathematics, University of Western Ontario, and founder of the Scientific Panel Investigating Nine-Eleven (SPINE), A.K Dewdney
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/operation_pearl.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A._K._Dewdney
Former chief Pentagon arms negotiator for the Middle East, USAF Col. (Ret) Don de Grand-Pre
http://www.prisonplanet.com/022904degrand.html
The reinvestigation of 9/11 is CRITICAL to taking back America. To study what really happened, start with any or all of the following sites: physics911.net, st911.org or .911truth.org. Then help spread the truth. That's it for me on this topic. I wish you all well.