justuptime.com - monitor your servers & websites

Opera Passes the ACID3 Test

You are viewing this site as a guest. Join our community to get your questions answered and share knowledge. Active members may advertise and ask for a website critique.
JeevesBond's picture
Moderator

He has: 3,489 posts

Joined: Jun 2002

It's only on an internal build, and not available to the public yet, but Opera has already passed the ACID3 test!

Apparently a technical preview version with the fixes for ACID3 included will be available next-week. Bearing in mind, I think, Safari's core: Webkit passes around 98% and, being Open Source, is available now. So it's still all to play for. If Webkit manages to get a nightly build that passes 100% out before Opera get a technical preview out then they win the race (in my opinion). Smiling

a Padded Cell our articles site!

JeevesBond's picture
Moderator

He has: 3,489 posts

Joined: Jun 2002

Sorry to double-post. Here's some information on the ACID tests. You can try the ACID test yourself, using nothing more than a Web browser. The ACID tests are designed to test the standards compliance of browsers, and browser makers seem to be competing on who can pass the tests first. This is generally good for standards. Smiling

Here's a direct link to the ACID3 test.

a Padded Cell our articles site!

Megan's picture
Administrator

She has: 10,032 posts

Joined: Jun 1999

Except that IE is still competing in the Acid 2 test Sad

Megan's picture
Administrator

She has: 10,032 posts

Joined: Jun 1999

Here's an interesting response from Eric Meyer:

Acid Redux

Basically what he's saying is that the Acid 3 test isn't an adequate measure of standards support. It's just "cherry picking" certain difficult elements to test and ignores large parts of the specifications. I think that even CSS 3 on it's own is probably too big to measure with one test.

JeevesBond's picture
Moderator

He has: 3,489 posts

Joined: Jun 2002

He's correct, but it's the best test we've got. Not only that, but his complaint is that it only tests small parts of the specifications. He's missing some important points, that make the test work, though:

  1. it tests stuff like SVG, this requires XML support, something certain browsers lack;
  2. since it tests a wide range of different Web standards, browsers need basic support for the features or the test will not work at all (see point one);
  3. testing corner cases often makes you find other bugs (it's one of the ways I test my own code);
  4. it's good that--already very compliant browsers--are competing to be more standards compliant;
  5. when this bunch of corner cases have been tested, a new ACID test will be formulated to exercise the browser's rendering engines;
  6. these tests are cumulative, the different ACID versions all test different things, once we get up to ACID 10 we'll have a pretty comprehensive test suite, whilst Eric Meyer is still whining on his blog Wink ;

I don't see Eric Meyer offering up solutions, only complaints. Am sure I've heard the same line from a certain Redmond based company on why version seven of their browser wouldn't pass ACID2. Meyer does seem to have morphed into a Microsoft apologist since WASP started working with them. How the mighty have fallen. Smiling

a Padded Cell our articles site!